Main Sources of CoJCoLDS Leader Quotes
CoJCoLDS General Conference Corpus
Critical Evaluations of CoJCoLDS Leaders
CoJCoLDS Apologetics
FAIRLDS—Apologetic branch of the CoJCoLDS
A New Narrative—Improving expectations of CoJCoLDS leaders
Faith Matters Foundation—Discussion on the reliability of CoJCoLDS leaders
Evaluating Doctrine—Research on comparative reliability of CoJCoLDS doctrines
Adjacent Topics
Hermetically Sealed Systems of LDS Thought—Diagrams that inspired the confirmation algorithm
Street Epistemology—Resources for everyday epistemic conversations
Yourbiasis—List of 24 common cognitive biases
How Minds Change—Book on influencing others despite cognitive bias
The Bite Model—Framework for evaluating ethics in religious organizations
NonStampCollector—Noah’s Ark—Humorous video on the historicity of Genesis
Models of Prophetic Revelation—List of 10 viewpoints on prophetic fallibility
An example set of five standards to distinguish true prophets was laid out previously. Another important standard was considered but ultimately omitted:
A true prophet will either:
Make a reliably observable true prediction of which only an omniscient god could have informed them, or
Perform a reliably observable miracle in which only an omnipotent god could have aided them.
Standard 6 may be even more useful than the other five for determining whether someone is a true prophet. It sets a high bar for entry into the realm of true prophets, whereas the other standards mainly exclude prophets based on false, contradictory, or unethical statements. One ironic disadvantage of standards 2-5 is that most babies meet them due to their inability to make false/contradictory/unethical statements. In contrast, Standard 6 immediately screens out most of the world’s population in search of someone with superhuman abilities. It also places a significant burden of proof on those who claim the standard is fulfilled.
President Hugh B. Brown seemed to affirm the usefulness of this standard when he taught that a true prophet “would be able to do superhuman things — things that no man could do without God’s help. The consequence or result of his message and work would be convincing evidence of his prophetic calling: ‘By their fruits ye shall know them’ (Matthew 7:20).”
It may be argued that Standard 6 is unfalsifiable because one can never rule out the possibility that an individual did such a miracle/prediction in an unobservable way (e.g., in private or without leaving a reliable record). This is correct—even an exhaustive search couldn’t rule out such unlimited possibilities (e.g., Perhaps the individual blew up the entire universe yesterday and reformed it again without leaving a trace of their activity.).
For this reason, the words “reliably observable” are included in Standard 6. This limits the list of predictions/miracles to those we can ensure were truly performed, and falsifiability is regained. For example, if someone publicly announced on the radio that the Red Sea would dry up overnight, both the prediction and miracle would be observable and falsifiable (i.e., We would be able to tell whether they had occurred or not.). Alternatively, if the Red Sea dried up overnight, with nobody publicly predicting this beforehand, and someone came around afterward saying, “I told you this would happen!” then that person’s claim would neither be reliably observable nor falsifiable (i.e., Maybe the person made the prediction beforehand, but we don’t have a reliable way to tell whether they did or not.). Thus, with the added stipulation of miracles/predictions being “reliably observable,” Standard 6 not only becomes falsifiable, but sets a high bar for entry into the realm of true prophets, placing a significant burden of proof on those who claim the standard is fulfilled.
Despite its potential utility, Standard 6 was excluded here for two reasons:
Cultural irrelevance—The CoJCoLDS has had at least 120 people sustained as “Prophets, Seers, and Revelators.” I estimate that very few CoJCoLDS members hold all 120 of them (except perhaps Joseph Smith) to this high standard.
Redundance—Evaluations of specific miracles/predictions of Joseph Smith already exist (see "References and Useful Links" in the appendix).
“Truth has no fear of the light. If an individual or an organization seeks to silence doubt or questioning in the private room or in the town square it is filled with fear and its house is built on sand. And if we have the truth, no harm can come from investigation. If we have not the truth, it ought to be harmed.”
—President J. Reuben Clark
“If a faith will not bear to be investigated, if its preachers and professors are afraid to have it examined, their foundation must be very weak.”
—President George A. Smith
“I think a full, free talk is frequently of great use; we want nothing secret nor underhanded, and I for one want no association with things that cannot be talked about and will not bear investigation.”
—President John Taylor
“In general it is true that nothing which cannot stand up under discussion and criticism is worth defending.”
—Elder James E. Talmage
“Now I mention freedom to express your thoughts. But I caution you that your thoughts and expressions must meet competition in the marketplace of thought. And in that competition, truth will emerge triumphant. Only error needs to fear freedom of expression.”
—President Hugh B. Brown
“The honest investigator must be prepared to follow wherever the search of truth may lead. Truth is often found in the most unexpected places. He must, with fearless and open mind, insist that facts are far more important than any cherished, mistaken beliefs, no matter how unpleasant the facts or how delightful the beliefs.”
—President Hugh B. Brown
“Preserve, then, the freedom of your mind in education and in religion, and be unafraid to express your thoughts and to insist upon your right to examine every proposition. We are not so much concerned with whether your thoughts are orthodox or heterodox as we are that you shall have thoughts.”
—President Hugh B. Brown
“The fact that He has promised further revelation is to me a challenge to keep an open mind and to be prepared to follow wherever my search for truth may lead.”
—President Hugh B. Brown
“There are forces at work in our society today which degrade an intellectual quest for knowledge. These forces are nothing new. They have always been powerful. They are anti-intellectual… Whether you are in the field of economics or political science, history or the behavioral sciences, continue your search for truth. And maintain humility sufficient to be able to revise your hypotheses as new truth comes to you by means of the spirit or the mind.”
—President Hugh B. Brown
"The rational foundation for [unjustified] claims to divine right are as easily established as the historical. The classical formula is given by Anselm: fides quaerens intellectum; you first decide what you are going to believe and then you set out to find intellectual demonstrations that will support it. And such proof comes easily and mechanically to hand if one has been 'steeled in the school of old Aquinas,' who gives us the useful rule: 'Since the faith rests on infallible truth, it would be impossible to bring forth a valid demonstration against it; for it is obvious that any arguments brought forth against the faith are not really proofs but soluble arguments.' Thus I might state as a true principle that any coin when tossed will always come down heads. I toss the coin, and it comes down tails, but according to St. Thomas' convenient rule, that toss does not count—it must be ruled out since it refutes a true principle; and so by disqualifying all unfavorable tosses I can exhaustively demonstrate my doctrine that any coin when tossed will always come down heads. With an arsenal of such useful weapons at their disposal, it is not surprising that the schoolmen can come up with any proofs they want in matters of authority or anything else. There is no more powerful argumentrix, Tertullian reminds us, than self-interest."
—Hugh Nibley